Hollywood Always Has Faith in the Profit, If Not the Prophet

c. 2005 Religion News Service (UNDATED) A mysterious visitor arrives from the heavens to walk among us. At first, hardly anyone believes in his existence. Gradually, though, more and more people come to know and follow him, as he teaches lessons of love to the meek and powerless. The powerful consider him a threat, however, […]

c. 2005 Religion News Service

(UNDATED) A mysterious visitor arrives from the heavens to walk among us. At first, hardly anyone believes in his existence. Gradually, though, more and more people come to know and follow him, as he teaches lessons of love to the meek and powerless.

The powerful consider him a threat, however, and when they capture him, he dies. Then, a miracle: He comes to life again through the force of love, and he leaves the world of humans to rise back to the heavens. The people who love him will wait for him to return, forever.


Recognize the story? Of course you do: It is one of the central stories of Western culture. Most American children know it well before they go to school, absorbing its lessons through repetition.

It is “E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial.”

It is also, with some variations, the story of “The Matrix,” “Shane,” “Star Wars,” “Superman” and countless other movies made by that godless cabal, Hollywood _ including the latest, “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.”

As the culture wars roil over the marketing of “Narnia” directly to church groups _ not to mention over the teaching of evolution, the separation of church and state and the supposed war on Christmas _ now might be a good time to pause, take a deep breath and reflect.

Contrary to popular belief, Hollywood not only believes in God _ Hollywood loves God.

Its reasons for loving God might not be pure. In fact, the reasons might be mostly crass and commercial, especially now, after Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ” made $604 million worldwide. But if you’re looking for true, come-to-Jesus awe, you don’t have to look much farther than the executive suites of the industry the Monday after “The Passion” had an $83.3 million opening weekend.

Gibson’s triumph inspired renewed professions of faith in Hollywood _ faith in the profit, if not the prophet. But whatever the reason, God is one of the great stars of the movies. He always has been, along with Moses, Jesus, the Holy Spirit and a wide assortment of angels.

Movies have embraced religion and the stories of both the Old and New Testaments from their very beginnings, more than 100 years ago. Among the first movies, both made in 1898, we can find the Passion play of Oberammergau and the temptation of St. Anthony. In 1912, the director of “From the Manger to the Cross” actually filmed on location in Jerusalem, Bethlehem and other sites in the Holy Land.

Cecil B. DeMille and D.W. Griffith mined the Bible for many of their films, starting a tradition of retelling Bible stories that stretches from “The Greatest Story Ever Told” all the way to “The Passion of the Christ.”


But the explicit retelling of Bible stories does not begin to cover the presence of Christ-figures, biblical allegories and plain old expressions of religious faith buried in movies that appear to be straightforward entertainment.

“E.T.” happens to be one of the more interesting cases in this category. Its marked similarities to the story of Jesus make it seem almost as blatant an allegory as the lion’s death and resurrection in “Narnia.”

E.T. has the power to heal with just a touch. He reveals a glowing heart. He sacrifices himself for Elliott, the lonely, melancholy boy who is searching for a father figure in the wilderness. When E.T. ascends back to heaven, he tells Elliott he always will be with him.

(FIRST OPTIONAL TRIM BEGINS)

Yet Melissa Matheson, who wrote the “E.T.” screenplay, has been quoted saying she recognized the connections only after seeing the movie, and director Steven Spielberg, who is Jewish, considered it a sci-fi movie about American suburban dreams.

That makes the connections all the more uncanny. It suggests just how deeply rooted these stories are in Western culture. It also makes one last observation worth a doctoral thesis: The ones who almost kill E.T. are scientists _ scientists who have been questioning his existence and searching for hard proof.

(FIRST OPTIONAL TRIM ENDS)

Spielberg shot “E.T.” from a low, almost knee-height perspective. He wanted the movie and E.T. himself to be seen from a child’s point of view.


Deliberate or not, children, the innocents, are usually the first to “see” the Christ figure in movies. They are the first to believe in him and worship him, echoing the “and a little child shall lead them” from the Old Testament.

A child leads the way in “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe,” in which author C.S. Lewis made the youngest child _ Lucy, the most innocent _ the initial believer. She continues to believe even when her brothers and sister mock her, eventually bringing the “sons of Adam and the daughters of Eve” into the fold.

(SECOND OPTIONAL TRIM BEGINS)

We see “Shane,” directed by George Stevens and released in 1953, through the eyes of a child, too. Joey Starrett, the son of homesteading farmers in the valley beneath the Grand Tetons, is the first to see the enigmatic stranger, Shane (“Someone’s comin’, Pa!”) and the first to worship him. (“I just love Shane!”)

Shane (played by Alan Ladd) is one of many “saviors” in American Westerns, which often play out as religious allegories. Clint Eastwood, for instance, paid direct homage to “Shane” in “Pale Rider” in 1985 and returned to the same themes in “Unforgiven.”

Shane’s resemblance to Jesus is hard to miss: He stands up for the meek and the oppressed in an epic battle between good and evil. He turns the other cheek several times, when the bad guys antagonize him. You even could argue that he performs a “miracle” when he helps bring down the big stump on Joe Starrett’s property.

It cannot be a coincidence that after he has “sacrificed” himself (and his hopes for a peaceful life among the ordinary people in the valley), the last line of the movie is: “Shane! Come back!”


(SECOND OPTIONAL TRIM ENDS)

Both “The Matrix” and the “Star Wars” series set the Christ allegory in science-fiction. Neo (Keanu Reeves), the hero of “The Matrix,” has a dual identity, a life in two worlds and is identified as “The Chosen One” (Neo is an anagram of “one”). He comes to save the oppressed, “real” humans in Zion; he fights a dark evil, he dies, and he comes back to life. He is “baptized” (with the choice of pills) by a John the Baptist figure, played by Laurence Fishburne, who announces his coming.

In “Star Wars,” we have both the Fallen Angel, Darth Vader, and the chosen one, Luke Skywalker, who fights for the oppressed in the epic battle between light and dark, good and evil. Luke must retreat to a wilderness, of sorts, to find the Force within. The Force makes him invincible.

Likewise, Superman has dual identities in two worlds, comes to save the oppressed, fights evil, and so on.

Some movies are less comprehensive than “E.T” and “The Matrix.” But the more you look for God, Jesus and religious themes in movies, the more you find. They turn up in every genre, from comedy (Monty Python’s “The Life of Brian,” George Burns in “Oh, God!”) to horror (“The Exorcist”).

So it turns out C.S. Lewis’ lion, Aslan, is in good company. He can join a divine club that includes not just Ladd, Reeves (both Keanu and George) and Mark Hamill, but also Morgan Freeman (“Bruce Almighty”), Michael Clark Duncan (“The Green Mile”) and Jack Nicholson (“One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”).

If God is everywhere, as Christians believe, then evidently “everywhere” includes the red carpet and the multiplex. It even includes the one place many evangelical Christians believe harbors Satan himself: Hollywood.


(Joanna Connors writes for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland.)

KRE/PH END CONNORS

Donate to Support Independent Journalism!

Donate Now!