c. 2007 Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly
NEW YORK _ The United States, the polls repeatedly show, is a religious country, with 90 percent of Americans saying they believe in God or a supreme being and more than 40 percent saying they attend religious services each week.
But there is another group, much smaller and less often heard from: unbelievers. In recent months, in books and on a sold-out off-Broadway stage, these religious skeptics have been raising their voices and asking to be heard.
In the one-woman off-Broadway show “Letting Go of God,” for example, Julia Sweeney, the former “Saturday Night Live” star, tells the audience: “This Old Testament God makes the grizzliest test to people’s loyalty. Like when he asks Abraham to murder his son Isaac _ as a kid we were taught to admire it. I caught my breath reading it.
“What kind of sadistic test of loyalty is that, to ask someone to kill his or her own child _ and isn’t the proper answer, `No’?”
She is just as hard on the New Testament.
“It was really hard to stay on Jesus’ side when he started saying really aggressive, just hateful things,” she says. “In Matthew he says, `I come not to bring peace but a sword.”’
Equally harsh on religion is evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, whose book “The God Delusion” currently occupies the No. 1 spot on Publishers Weekly’s best-seller list for religion titles. Dawkins argues there is no evidence for a creator and is among the best known _ and surely also among the most strident _ of modern atheists.
“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction,” Dawkins said at recent book signing in Washington. “A petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak. A vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser. A misogynistic, homophobic, racist, malevolent bully.”
He was a little kinder to the late Pope John Paul II.
“He suffered an assassination attempt in Rome and attributed his survival to the intervention of Our Lady of Fatima,” Dawkins told the audience. “A maternal hand guided the bullet. One cannot help wondering why she didn’t guide it to miss him altogether.”
While much of the renewed militant atheism comes as a reaction to the strident rhetoric of the religious right, theologian Harvey Cox of the Harvard Divinity School says he thinks Dawkins is behaving just like those he criticizes.
“I think of Richard Dawkins as the kind of Jerry Falwell of the atheists,” Cox told the PBS program “Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly.” “He takes the most narrow and the most legalistic side of religion and makes that religion _ and then he’s against it.”
Another religious skeptic, neuroscientist Sam Harris, has written two books emphasizing what he sees as the lack of evidence supporting religion: “The End of Faith” and “Letter to a Christian Nation.”
“The usefulness of religion, the fact that it gives life meaning, that it makes people feel good, is not an argument for the truth of any religious doctrine,” Harris said.
“Faith,” he added in a recent speech, “is really the license that reasonable people give one another to keep believing when reasons fail.”
Cox, however, thinks the scientists miss the point, arguing that unlike the material world, God is unprovable.
“It’s when they step over and scientists say, `There isn’t any God because, look, we can’t prove him.’ Well, the canons of proof are not applicable to that question and it’s not something that can be proved or disproved.”
The religious skeptics also challenge the idea that religion is the only source for morality and ethics.
“If religion were the only durable foundation for morality, you would suspect atheists to be really badly behaved,” Harris says. “You would go to a group like the National Academy of Sciences. These are the most elite scientists, 93 percent of whom reject the idea of God. You would expect these guys to be raping and killing and stealing with abandon.”
Paul Kurtz, one of the nation’s leading secular humanists and head of the Center for Inquiry, puts the emphasis differently.
“Secular humanists are defined not by what they are against _ we are not naysayers _ but what we are for. And we are for a humanistic world in which some of the basic human values and principles have an opportunity to be realized,” he says.
The Center has opened a Washington office to be a counter-voice to what it sees as faith-driven public policy, especially the federal ban on funding embryonic stem cell research and the ongoing attacks on the teaching of evolution.
“We are concerned with the fundamentalist religion everywhere,” Kurtz told a recent news conference in Washington, “and their alliance with political ideological movements to block science.”
Cox says that, on balance, he welcomes the challenge from the current crop of atheists.
“It (atheism) always makes a comeback, I think, when religious people get too arrogant,” he says. “When they begin to look as though or speak as though they know it all. When they begin to impose themselves in ways that are unwelcome to other people in society. Then atheism is kind of, for me, a welcomed critique of this arrogance.”
(This story was originally reported by Betty Rollin of “Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly.”)
KRE/PH END ANDERSON
Editors: To obtain photos of Cox, Sweeney and Dawkins and a file photo of Harris, go to the RNS Web site at https://religionnews.com. On the lower right, click on “photos,” then search by subject or slug.
See related commentary, RNS-KOUKL-COLUMN, transmitted Jan. 26, 2007.
A version of this story first appeared on the PBS program “Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly.” This article may be reprinted by RNS clients. Please use the Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly credit line.)
