NEW YORK (RNS) The chancellor and head of the seminary at Yeshiva University, the flagship U.S. school for Orthodox Judaism, resigned his posts on Monday (July 1) and acknowledged that he had mishandled sex abuse allegations against staff members in the 1980s.

Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm photo courtesy Folksonomy via Wikimedia Commons

Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm photo courtesy Folksonomy via Wikimedia Commons

This image is available for Web publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

In a letter sent to students, faculty, alumni and donors, Rabbi Norman Lamm, 85, said that in failing to report the abuse complaints to police, he was acting “in a way that I thought was correct, but which now seems ill conceived.”

“I understand better today than I did then that sometimes, when you think you are doing good, your actions do not measure up,” wrote Lamm, for decades a leading figure in Orthodox Judaism.

“And when that happens — one must do teshuvah,” he said, using the Hebrew word for repentance. “So, I too must do teshuvah.”

Lamm’s resignation comes more than six months after a Jewish newspaper, The Forward, revealed that university officials responded to complaints of sexual abuse by staff at an affiliated boys’ school by quietly allowing at least two suspected abusers to leave and find work elsewhere.

More than 20 men have said that they were abused by either Rabbi George Finkelstein or Rabbi Macy Gordon and that the university knew about the allegations and covered them up; both rabbis, who now live in Israel, have denied the charges.

Kevin Mulhearn, a lawyer representing 22 men allegedly abused at Yeshiva University High School between 1971 and 1989, said Lamm’s apology was “a positive first step” but said the university needed to do more.

“The conspiracy of silence at Y.U. involves many high-level administrators, not just Rabbi Lamm,” Mulhearn told The Forward. “It is the institution as a whole, not just one man, which needs to make amends.”

Lamm took over as Yeshiva president in 1976 and remained as chancellor and head of the prestigious seminary after he retired as president in 2003.

In his letter on Monday, Lamm did not directly say that he was stepping down because of the abuse scandal. He said the resignation was “in accordance with an agreement reached 3 years ago” and indicated that he was not in good health, saying that his family had to help him write the letter.

His discussion of the abuse episodes also took up just four paragraphs in a lengthy six-page reflection on his tenure.

The university said in a statement released to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on Monday that Lamm had agreed to leave three years ago when his contract expired in June 30 of this year. The current YU president, Richard M. Joel, released a brief statement that made no mention of the abuse scandal and praised Lamm for guiding the university with “steadfastness and vision” and for making “unparalleled” contributions to Jewish life.

Still, Lamm’s departure is another jolt to a cornerstone of the Modern Orthodox movement.

In May, The Forward reported that an investigation commissioned by Yeshiva’s board of trustees to delve into the charges had stalled.

And in March a top rabbinic dean at Yeshiva’s seminary gave a talk in which he said sex abuse charges can be “tall tales” spun by children and that they should be screened by a board of rabbis before being reported to authorities.

In the talk, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, one of the most respected members of the seminary’s faculty, was also quoted using a derogatory Yiddish term for black people when he said that reporting abuse allegations is especially dangerous because officials could put a Jew “in a cell together with a shvartze, with a … black Muslim who wants to kill all the Jews.”

The YU episodes also tracked reports that leaders in the ultra-Orthodox movement have covered up allegations of child sexual abuse in their insular communities, and may still do so.

These incidents, as well as reporting on sexual abuse scandals in schools, college football, the Boy Scouts and other organizations that work with children, have often mirrored the dynamic that led to the abuse crisis that has rocked the Catholic Church in the past decade.

Child safety experts say that broadening the focus on abuse to communities outside the Catholic Church would be a positive development if it prompts an awareness of the scale of the problem and the need to take action.


  1. After reading Dr. Norman Lamm’s statement, I want all the people who were allegedly sexually abused at YU to know that in late December I was posting on other sites that I supported their right to take the issue to court. I wrote that after reading up on sexual abuse cases and speaking to many who contacted him, I understood why neither the victims nor their parents spoke up .I encourage YU, its leadership to offer a sincere apology for what happened to these victims. I also encourage the RCA to make a similar statement regarding their members who either looked away or shook off complaints. RABBI DR. BERNHARD ROSENBERG

  2. It is time for healing. Wish this statement would have been made earlier. Sexual abuse of any kind must not be allowed and we can not blame the victim. I TOO had to learn this truth and apologize for not understanding earlier. It was the victims who taught me. Apologies should be made and mechila asked. RABBI DR. BERNHARD ROSENBERG

  3. Did Rabbi Lamm’s handling of the sex abuse allegations merely reflect his own personal “ignorance” and the general culture of the times (the defense being offered by various commentators), or did it rather express a vicious institutional callousness, with which he collaborated and which arguably continues today?

    In this regard, it is interesting to observe that YU’s current vice provost, while still the chairman of the NYU Jewish Studies department (a position from which he resigned to assume his current post at YU), testified in a court of law that “nobody reads” the NYU faculty code of conduct. One wonders if this statement reflects the ethical standards and attitudes of YU’s current administration. For further information and commentary, see:

    And see this account of how the same vice provost of YU recently had letters sent to various legal experts, including Eugene Volokh of UCLA, demanding that they remove certain material, apparently critical of him, from their websites:

    Was Rabbi Lamm even aware of these efforts and statements by YU’s vice provost? Does YU’s current president, Benjamin Joel (who is a former prosecutor) support the attitudes they seem to reflect? All of this seems to reflect (at best) an ongoing laxity in ethical standards at YU, and it is hard to see how the “apology” of Dr. Lamm could possibly have any impact on the situation.

    • A small correction to my comment above: the current president of Yeshiva University is former prosecutor Richard Joel (not Benjamin). President Joel’s own ethical standards are a topic of considerable interest, as can be seen from items such as the following:

  4. “So, I too must do teshuvah.”

    No, not enough. 5yrs in a Federal prison for aiding and abetting…15 if he doesn’t cough up on all abuse charges.

    “… they should be screened by a board of rabbis before being reported to authorities.”

    Wrong. A board of rabbis protecting a Jewish institution would hardly be neutral in its investigations.

    This is something that all institutions should work on…a report of a crime should be passed to the secular authority without delay and without consideration of the harm to the institution such revelations will have.

  5. Wakeupamerica911

    YU had more despicable crimes committed by its leadership against its students during it former president Lam’s tenure. The triple horns ..
    Lawsuits against YU as an institution would only hurt the current students and would reform no one.. More should be extracted straight out of its crooked former leadership.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments with many links may be automatically held for moderation.