Transsexual pastor prompts uneasy questions for Methodists

c. 2007 Religion News Service BALTIMORE _ The Rev. Drew Phoenix is many things to many people. To St. John’s of Baltimore City, he’s the fun-loving pastor who counsels them, takes their kids hiking, explains Scripture, and plunges into worthy causes. To conservative Methodists, Phoenix embodies another front in the “culture wars,” a rebel who […]

c. 2007 Religion News Service

BALTIMORE _ The Rev. Drew Phoenix is many things to many people.

To St. John’s of Baltimore City, he’s the fun-loving pastor who counsels them, takes their kids hiking, explains Scripture, and plunges into worthy causes.


To conservative Methodists, Phoenix embodies another front in the “culture wars,” a rebel who has defied God and nature and should be removed from ministry.

To mainstream society, Phoenix is an enigma who transcends traditional sexual boundaries, provoking uncomfortable questions about the interplay between body, mind and soul.

To the Judicial Council of the United Methodist Church he’s number IV on the docket for their Oct. 24-27 session: “A Review of Bishop’s Decision … Whether Transgendered Persons Are Eligible for Appointment in The United Methodist Church.”

The issue of transgenderism seems too hot to touch for religious Americans already bitterly divided over sexual orientation. A number of Methodist theologians and ethicists, asked to comment for this article, declined.

But as scientific advances and changing sexual mores allow transgender people to slowly move into the mainstream, religious leaders will soon have to grapple with theological implications of gender identity, scholars say.

In practical terms, they have to deal with Phoenix and whether he should remain in ministry. The judicial hearing of the United Methodist Church, one of the largest Christian bodies in the U.S., may be a high-water mark for transgender awareness in the pews.

“The theological issues here are very important,” said Mark Jordan, a professor of Christian ethics at Atlanta’s Emory University. “It’s not just an issue of church discipline and it’s not just a freak show.”

About 18 months ago, after 46 years of feeling like a soul trapped in the wrong body, a Methodist minister had sexual reassignment surgery, at last aligning psyche and sex.


The Rev. Ann Gordon became the Rev. Drew Phoenix.

Phoenix, now 48, describes the transition from female to male as a homecoming.

“For me, now it’s very much about being embodied, my spirit is in a body now,” Phoenix said in an interview. As a female, “my spirit was just, like, homeless.”

The 40-odd members of St. John’s, who say they pride themselves in being the most accepting and inclusive Methodist church in Baltimore, said their minister’s sex change was no big deal. They had some questions, which Phoenix answered in individual meetings, but no large theological hang-ups.

“It was like, `Ok, great, congratulations. You’re living as God intended now, how wonderful,”’ said Kara Ker, 33, a social worker and lifelong Methodist. “Every now and then people struggle with the pronouns, that’s the biggest challenge.”

But to some Methodists, Phoenix’s ministry posed larger problems.

At a meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Conference last May, several pastors questioned whether the ministry should be open to transgendered people.

Baltimore-Washington Bishop John Schol reappointed Phoenix, reasoning that the Methodist’s Book of Discipline has no rule forbidding transgender pastors. Now the nine-member Judicial Council _ the United Methodist Church’s supreme court _ will rule on Schol’s decision in San Francisco later this month.

Dr. James Holsinger Jr., President Bush’s nominee for U.S. surgeon general,heads the council. Senate Democrats have stalled Holsinger’s appointment in part because he has described gay sex as abnormal and unhealthy.


Conservatives have already promised to pass a ban on transgendered pastors at the Methodists’ next General Conference in 2008.

“Most church people instinctively recognize there are problems with the church affirming a gender change but haven’t really thought through all the implications,” said Mark Tooley of UMAction, a branch of the conservative Institute on Religion and Democracy.

(BEGIN FIRST OPTIONAL TRIM)

If some theological types are troubled by the implications of transgenderism, scientists seem to be equally mystified by its origins.

The American Psychiatric Association labels transgenderism a “disorder” but notes that “many transgender people do not experience their transgender feelings and traits to be distressing or disabling, which implies that being transgender does not constitute a mental disorder per se.”

Moreover, the APA says, “there is no generally accepted explanation for why some people are transgender,” listing genetics, prenatal hormones and early-life experiences as possible influences.

The absence of a concrete explanation for transgenderism, as well as the cultural norms it upsets, can alarm those accustomed to dealing with fixed gender categories.


“What’s the first question people ask when a baby is born?” said Melissa Wilcox, an assistant professor of religion and director of the gender studies program at Whitman College in Walla Walla, Wash. “They need to know whether it’s a girl or a boy.”

Conservative Christians tend to treat transgenderism as an extreme form of homosexuality. It’s a disorder to be overcome, a cross to be borne.

(END FIRST OPTIONAL TRIM)

Christians and Jews have traditionally derived fixed notions of gender from the Hebrew Bible, when God creates Adam and Eve. To mess with that, some argue, is to mess with God’s plan for creation.

Other conservatives point to Deuteronomy, which says, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.”

“There’s the issue of what’s God’s intention for us,” said the Rev. David Simpson, a United Methodist pastor from the Baltimore suburb of Ellicott City, who challenged Phoenix’s reappointment. “Is that something that we get to choose?”

On the other hand, some medical professionals and transgendered people say gender identity and sexual orientation are separate things.


“It’s not about whom I love,” Phoenix said. “It’s about who I am.”

Moreover, they argue, science is demonstrating that gender identity is fluid _ not fixed into binary categories. And it’s innate, not a choice.

Finally, those who argue the “God doesn’t make mistakes” and “Don’t mess with creation” lines readily make use of medical procedures to change their bodies, Phoenix said.

“Think of all the vaccinations, medications and pharmaceuticals we take,” he said. “We completely alter our bodies.”

(BEGIN SECOND OPTIONAL TRIM)

But to many Christians, there’s a fundamental difference between taking a vaccine and changing something as basic as gender.

In 2003, the Vatican said transsexuals suffer from “mental pathologies” and barred them from Roman Catholic religious orders. Last year, a Christian college in Michigan fired a transgender professor for failing to live up to Christian “ideals.”

On the other hand, the United Church of Christ, traditionally the country’s most liberal Christian denomination, ordained its first transsexual pastor, Bran Scott, in 1999.


Other mainline Protestant churches haven’t banned transgender pastors, but haven’t exactly welcomed them either.

The Rev. Erin K. Swenson, a Presbyterian pastor who transitioned from male to female in 1996, has written that “transgendered individuals are modern lepers in a culture that worships at the altar of sexual stereotypes.”

(END SECOND OPTIONAL TRIM)

In 2002, the Methodists’ Baltimore-Washington Conference was home to a similar dispute, when the Rev. Richard A. Zomastny had a sex change and became Rebecca Ann Steen. Steen withdrew her reapplication for ministry under pressure from fellow Methodists.

Simpson, of Ellicott City, said it’s about time his church had a discussion of the issue, with all of the theological and scientific implications brought to bear.

“This is our second case in five years, and we’re no closer to answers then we ever were,” Simpson said.

(THIRD OPTIONAL TRIM FOLLOWS)

Emory’s Jordan said it’s not surprising many churches haven’t drawn up rules to deal with transgender pastors.

“Why did it take so long to get explicit rules against ordaining lesbian and gay people?” he said. “Churches expected these kinds of people just to disappear and go away. They expected the same with transsexuals _ that if you went that way you were going to leave the ministry or leave the church.”


Conservatives tried unsuccessfully to pass a resolution banning transgender pastors at the church’s last General Conference in 2004, said Diane DeLapp, a transsexual from Massachusetts who heads Affirmation, an advocacy group for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Methodists.

“We seem to be the target now,” DeLapp said.

The congregation at St. John’s say they would be devastated if they lost Phoenix, whom they describe as the beating heart at the center of their growing church. When Phoenix started five years ago, eight people showed up for Sunday worship; now 40 do.

But the pastor said he’s prepared for whatever happens.

As Phoenix began to preach on a recent Sunday, beneath the huge cross and beside the posters proclaiming “This Ain’t Your Daddy’s Church,” he told the Gospel story about Jesus and the 10 lepers.

After Jesus heals the lepers, he tells them to visit the priests and get certified for temple life. One, a Samaritan, realizes he’s been healed and turns back to thank Jesus.

“The Samaritan realizes he’s already recovered what most matters,” Phoenix told his church, “not certification, but his own healing.”

KRE/RB END BURKE1,600 words, with three optional trims to 1,000

Editors: note time element in 5th graf (Oct. 24-27)

Photos of Phoenix preaching at his church are available via https://religionnews.com

Donate to Support Independent Journalism!

Donate Now!